I’m a little frustrated by all the information out there in the world today concerning the evil of leggings/yoga pants/things that show the curve of a woman’s buttock. I’m even more frustrated at the way that policing the bodies of women has become so commonplace that others would feel free to do such things as photograph and post (presumably) humiliating pictures of a stranger’s buttocks in nude colored leggings.
Granted, on the pretense of having a slight amount of fashion sense, I have not before worn, nor will I likely ever wear, leggings that resemble my skin tone as a pant. I just don’t think there should be confusion about whether I am naked or not naked in public. When I want to be naked in public, you will know without doubt. So, the nude leggings are not my thing. But some women choose to wear them out and about, as a pant.
My dictionary’s definition of pants tells me to see “trousers”. The definition of trousers is: a usually loose-fitting outer garment for the lower part of the body, having individual leg portions that reach typically to the ankle but sometimes to any of various other points from the upper leg down. So, “usually”, “typically”, “sometimes” and “various other” would express, in my opinion, that having stuff cover some to most of each leg separately is a pant. We can all note that the recent trend toward the “skinny jean” demonstrates that the loose-fitting designation no longer applies to pants. So, in effect, leggings are pants as long as you wear them as outer garments.
Whether or not you believe they should be worn as outerwear does not make them pants. I wear see through/sheer tops rather frequently. I usually choose to wear an under-layer of a camisole or tank top, but that does not negate the fact that the sheer item is my outerwear. It is being worn on the outside, regardless of whether I put something under it or no.
So, here is a tip for all those who feel the need to police the ways that women (or men, for that matter) choose to cover or not cover their bodies:
STOP DOING IT!!
It isn’t your right or responsibility to shame others for their clothing. If you find it personally offensive, look away. Maybe try looking them in the eye and saying a kind hello instead of fixating on the curvature of the buttock?
Women’s butts are not there for you to gawk at, shame, or police in any way. Women’s butts are there to facilitate things like sitting and walking and squatting and a number of other actions that muscles and tendons and joints in that area support or make possible. Can we all just look at a butt and see it as a thing people have, because they are useful, and not something to fear or dread or shame or assign some evil or undesirable qualities upon?
In a Facebook comment, I pointed out that I wear leggings with regularity due to a medical condition. One symptom of my syndrome is allodynia, the experience of pain from things that do not normally cause pain. One thing that causes me pain is the traditionally acceptable buttoned pant. Waistbands that are not elastic or drawstring can cause me great suffering. Instead of being supportive or compassionate toward me when I expressed this suffering, I was told it is “fine” for me to wear leggings as long as I cover them with a dress or tunic, to spare children the “indecency” of seeing my butt.
Seriously?! The issue that is most important here is not letting children be aware of the female buttock, and I receive your permission to minimize my suffering only if I am more aware of your definition of decency than I am of my comfort? I wonder, would these same people tell a cancer patient that their bald head is fine, as long as they cover it with a wrap or scarf or hat, so their children don’t need be frightened by baldness. Or, would these people say to a dementia sufferer, it is fine if you lose your brain function, as long as you have the decency to do it in the nursing home where I don’t need to be exposed to you voiding in your Depends and drooling in public? Is my ass so evil that my own suffering must be subject to your sense of decency? And maybe you need to seriously assess the development of your sense of decency, if the body of over half of the population of the earth is considered indecent in your definitions.
And, while we are speaking of definitions, “decent” is defined as “conforming with generally accepted standards”. I find the shaming of the female form indecent. And I intend to do all that is within my power to change standards, until those which are generally accepted are those that express equality and diversity and autonomy, and not the shaming and oppression of women (or men, or children, or persons not conforming to the gender binary, or anyone else in the universe).
Who’s with me?